Filter by tags
Filter by resource types

Cultural Competency from Better Evaluation

Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD), Evaluation

Evaluators may come across situations where they have to work in a cultural context other than of their own. Culturally competent evaluators not only respect the cultures represented in the evaluation but recognize their own ‘culturally based assumptions’; take into account the ‘differing world view of evaluation stakeholders and target communities’ and select culturally appropriate evaluation options and strategies.

Evaluate

NHMRC’s Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Evaluation, Safety and wellbeing

This report provides guidelines for researchers and stakeholders to ensure their work is safe, respectful, responsible, high quality and of benefit to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities.

NHRMC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) – Updated 2018

Evaluation, Safety and wellbeing

High quality data can help us understand if we are on track, and if clients are benefiting as they would like to. If you are responsible for collecting data for evaluation there is lots to consider, including respecting client confidentiality, being cautious of potential power imbalances and accommodating for diverse literacy levels. Ensuring that methods and tools are fit for purpose and our processes are ethical is essential. Become familiar with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) – Updated 2018.

Bond – Evidence Principles Toolkit

Evaluation

This guide was designed by British Overseas NGOs for Development (BOND) to support NGOs to assess and improve the quality of evidence in evaluation reports.

Evaluate

Clear Horizon – Resources

Evaluation

Clear Horizon offers a range of tools and resources specific to monitoring and evaluation to measure the impact and achievement of project outcomes. These include the Most Significant Change Technique and Collaborative Outcomes Reporting.

Outcomes Rating Scale (ORS) and Session Rating Scales (SRS)

Evaluation

Developed by Scott Miller PhD, psychologist and co-founder of the International Center for Clinical Excellence and the Institute for the Study of Therapeutic Change, The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and Session Rating Scale (SRS) are brief measures for tracking client functioning and the quality of the therapeutic alliance. Each instrument takes less than a minute for clients to complete and for clinicians to score and interpret. Versions of the scales are available for adults, children, adolescents in 18 different languages.

Evaluating the outcomes of programs for Indigenous families and communities

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Evaluation

This is a practitioner resource by Stewart Muir and Adam Dean outlining some of the key considerations for organisations who are thinking about evaluating the outcomes or impact of a program for Indigenous families or communities.

The Australian Centre for Social Innovation (TACSI) Toolkit

Evaluation

The Australian Centre for Social Innovation (TACSI) has a range of useful tools for co-design including a webinar exploring what is human centred design, and what does it take to do well?

The Problem Solver’s Toolkit Poster

Evaluation

This poster is a handy print-out for your office or desk for reference when designing a new approach, helping to make sure you don't miss out on any key design ingredients!

Join the OPEN community - It's Free